Levels of Abstraction, Contrast and Paradox in Sawāneḥ by Ahmad Ghazali

Document Type : Original Article

Author

Assistant Professor of Persian Language and Literature, Arak University, Arak, Iran

Abstract

The school of Ahmad Ghazali, his beliefs and interpretations in the context of mysticism, have gained a special aspect of form and meaning. Ghazali's avoidance of directly and openly dealing with the field of mysticism, apart from the heterogeneity of the textual context of his works from other mystical works, has also caused ambiguity in the textual context. In the book of Ghazali's accidents, countless double confrontations can be seen at the surface level; however, due to the transformations that have occurred in the level of relationships and other levels related to them, the authority of the text of love stories has turned into a temporary and transitory situation. Therefore, at the level of deep construction, aligned with Derrida's logic, sometimes by deconstructing the strains of dual oppositions and transferring them, the levels of reality have been transformed into other levels of abstraction, and by creating new links between them, the arena of single meaning and certainty Meaning is challenged. This method has sometimes been associated with changing the value of signifiers, and sometimes by using both this and that style, instead of either this or that style (replacing difference instead of distinction), has caused the creation of a new level based on paradox. In the following article, after understanding terms such as: authority, familiar and foreign boundaries, difference and distinction, levels of abstraction, connection and difference, based on the descriptive-analytical method, the types of paradoxes in Ahmed Ghazali's accidents have been investigated.

Keywords

Main Subjects

References

  1. 1.Asaberger, Artur (2007), methods of media analysis, translated by Parviz Ejlali, third edition, Tehran: Ministry of Culture and Guidance.

    1. Ashuri, Dariush (1999), mysticism and randy in Hafez's poetry, Tehran: Center.
    2. Allen, Graham (2000), inter-textuality, translation of Payam Yazdan Jo, Tehran: Center.
    3. Ahmadi, Babak (2002), Text structure and interpretation, Tehran: Center.
    4. Stace, Watt (2004), Mysticism and Philosophy, translated by Bahauddin Khorramshahi, Tehran: Soroush.
    5. Ishaqian, Javad (2004), Criticism of the structure of Klidar, Nafeh Publishing House, 6th year, No. 28, 9-21.
    6. Akbari Gandmani, Mehrdad (2013), analysis of the dynamics of myth in inter-textual relations (a case study of Abul Fattouh Razi's commentary), PhD thesis, Tehran: Tarbiat Modares University.
    7. Emami, Nasrallah (2005), Basics and Methods, Literary Criticism, Tehran: Jami.
    8. Bresler, Charles (2006), An Introduction to the Theory of Literary Criticism, translated by Mustafa Abedini Fard, first edition, Tehran: Nilofar.
    9. Tabe'i, Ahmad (2004), The relationship between the postmodern idea and indeterminacy (a comparative study of Western philosophy and art), Tehran: Ni.
    10. Tajik, Mohammad Reza (2008), An Introduction to Discourse Analysis, Collection of Articles and Discourse Analysis, Tehran: Discourse Culture.
    11. Chandler, Daniyal (2014), Basics of Semiotics, translated by Mehdi Parsa and edited by Farzan-e Sojoudi, Tehran: Surah Mehr.
    12. Haqqani, Nader (2009), translation ideas and theories, Tehran: Amirkabir.

    14.Sosoure, Ferdinan (2007), General Linguistics, translated by Cyrus Safavi, Tehran: Hermes.

    1. Royle, Nicholas (2008), Jacques Derrida, dynamic translation, Imani, Tehran: Center.

    16.Zarin-Kob, Abdul Hossein (1989), Ser''ney, third edition, Tehran: Scientific.

    1. Sakalovsky, Robert (2004), An Introduction to Phenomenology, translated by Mohammad Reza Qurbani, Tehran: Gam-No.
    2. Selden, Raman; Widdowson, Peter (2004), Guide to Contemporary Literary Theory, translated by Abbas Mokhbar, Tehran: New Design.
    3. Shafiei-Kadkani, Mohammad Reza (11991), music of poetry, third edition, Tehran: Agah.

    20.Safavi, Korosh (2010), from linguistics to literature, third edition, Tehran: Surah Mehr.

    1. Zimran, Mohammad (1999), Michel Foucault, Knowledge and Power, Tehran: Hermes.
    2. Ghazali Tousi, Ahmad Ibn Mohammad (2008), Accidents; According to the narration of Qasim Kashkouli, Tehran: Third.

    23.Fakuhi, Nasser (2016), History of Thought and Anthropological Theories, Tehran: Ney.

    24.Kaler, Jonathan (2005), Literary Theory, translated by Farzaneh Taheri, second edition, Tehran: Center.

    25.Meshkawt-Aldini, Mahdi (1999), Persian grammar based on Gashtari theory, second edition, Mashhad: Ferdowsi University of Mashhad.

    26.Meqdadi, Bahram (1998), Dictionary of Literary Criticism Terms, Tehran: Fekr-e Rooz.

    27.Makarik, Irena (2004), Encyclopedia of Contemporary Literary Theory, translated by Mehran Mohajer and Mohammad Nabavi, Tehran: Agah.

    28.Nojoomian, Amir Ali (2006), Articles of Barthes and Derrida's Thoughts, Tehran: Art Academy.

    29.Derrid jacqus(1982), signature event contexet, in margins of philosophy, translated by alan bass, Chicago university of Chicago press.

    30.johnson Barbara (1993), translators introduction pp vii-xxxiii,in dissemination, edited by Jacques derrida, London :Athlone press.

    31.mikics, david(2007), a new hand book of literary terms, 1th edition: London: yale university press.

    32.sauss are, Ferdinand be (1986), course de linguistique generale, paris: payot.

    33.derridaT jacqus(1973), stracture, signand play in the discourse of human suiences, in the stracturalist , controversy, edited by R, macksey and E. Donato, Baltimor and john Hopkins

    34.Abul Qasimi, Seyyedah Maryam (2011), "A journey through Ahmad Ghazali's thoughts and ideas", Cognition magazine, No. 33, Spring, 233-252.

    35.Payandeh, Hossein (1990), The Basics of Formalism in Literary Criticism. Cultural cosmos, 7th Year, No.2, 26-30.

    36. Tomzad, Sara and Taj Bakhsh, Parvin (2018), "Research on semantic contradictions in Hezar-O-1 Shab Nu and Paribad by Mohammad Ali Oloumi", Scientific Journal of Linguistic and Rhetorical Studies, 10th Year , Number 20, 149-174.

    37. Junqani, Algune (2013), "Sana'i's Approach to Dual Contrasts", Quranic Studies, Faculty of Humanities, Kashan University, No. 19, 29-54.

    38. Shiri, Qahraman (2010), "Importance and Types of Ambiguity in Researches", Journal of Literary Techniques, Article 4, Volume 3, No. 2, 15-36.

    39. Sadeghi Goghari; Yousefipour Kermani;Puran, Esfandiarpour, Houshmand (1401), "Linguistic and Rhetorical Defamiliarization in Hossein Panahi's Poetry", Scientific Journal of Linguistic and Rhetorical Studies,13th Year, No.28, 159-186.

    40. Tayefi, Shirzad and Shahsund, Atefeh (2012), "Review of Qalandriyat in Diwan-e Attar-e Neyshaburi", Adian and Irfan Publication, 45th Year, No. 2, 39-61.

    41. Amoush, Khloud (2008), "Qur'an discourse, a linguistic study of the connection between the text and the context of the Qur'an" (case study of Surah Baqarah), translated by Hossein Seidi, Tehran: Sokhon Publications.

    42. Fotuhi, Mahmoud (2007), "Deconstruction of Rhetorical; The role of rhetorical devices in breaking and deconstructing the text", Literary Criticism Quarterly, 1st Year, No. 3, 109-125.

    43. Mosleh, Ali Asghar and Parsakhanqah, Mehdi (2010), "Deconstruction as a Strategy", Metaphysics Magazine, 3rd Year, No. 11 and 12, Autumn, 59-72.

    44. Malek-Marzaban, Nasrin Faqih and Javaheri, Seyedah Maryam (2013), "Examination of the circular structure of Ahmad Ghazali's love affairs", two scientific-research quarterly of mystical literature of Al-Zahra University, 3rd year, No. 57-81.

    45. Mir Baghri Fard, Seyyed Ali Asghar and Algune Joshghani, Masoud (2009), "Analysis of Shatah based on the separation of ontology and epistemology", Literary Studies, No. 13, 29-60.

    46. Nabilu, Alireza (2012), "Investigation of double contrasts in Hafez's sonnets", Persian Language and Literature Quarterly, 21st Year, No.74, 69-91.

    47. Nojoomian, Amir Ali (2002), "Revenue on Breaking the Foundation", Book of the Month of Literature and Philosophy, April, 59-50.

The Journal Of Linguistic and Rhetorical Studies
Volume 14, Issue 31
May 2023
Pages 7-30

Files

Share

How to cite

Statistics