Rhetorical Semiotics in “The Pear Tree” and its film Adaptation

Document Type : Original Article

Authors

1 Professor of Persian Language and Literature, Qom University, Qom, Iran (Corresponding Author)

2 Professor of Persian Language and Literature, Qom University, Qom, Iran .

3 PhD student of Persian Language and Literature, Qom University, Qom, Iran .

Abstract

Rhetorical semiotics is one of the types of "textual codes" in Daniel Chandler''s tripartite classification, encompassing a broader range than previous rhetorical discussions and is not limited to verbal elements; rather, these signs can be sought in images, sounds, or the context of speech. In this semiotic approach, the relationships between signs and their implicit meanings are examined from a rhetorical perspective, and in addition to linguistics and literary works, it is applicable to other artistic forms such as cinema, painting, photography, music, and architecture. In this article, we examined "The Pear Tree"  and its film adaptation based on rhetorical signs in four  semiotics domains of symbols, intertextual elements, oppositions, and expressive elements, each of which consisting of several components. The results of these analyses showed that rhetorical signs such as metaphor, simile, irony, metonymy, synecdoche, proverbs, binary oppositions, paradox, and various symbols related to people, objects, sounds, and nature are embedded throughout the text, accompanied by hints that guide the audience to discover the rhetorical signs. Based on the analyses, instances related to the first category, semiotics of symbols, and the fourth category, semiotics of expressive elements, were found more frequently than the other two categories in the story and the film adaptation. Moreover, the most significant rhetorical sign of the two works can be observed in the title, the Pear Tree, which serves as a metaphor for the main character.

Keywords


  • Ahmadi, Babak. (1996). From Visual Signs to Text (Towards the Semiotics of Visual Communication). 2nd ed. Tehran: Markaz.

    Ahmadi, Babak. (2021). Structure and Interpretation of Text. 22nd ed. Tehran: Markaz. [In Persian]

  • Bertens, Hans. (2005). Fundamentals of Literary Theory. Mohammad-Reza Abolghasemi. Tehran: Mahi.
  • Birami, Reyhaneh. (2015). A Visual-Semiotic Study of Three Films Based on the Stories of Gholam-Hossein Sa’edi.A. Thesis, Faculty of Art, University of Neyshabur. [In Persian]
  • Chandler, Daniel. (2008). Foundations of Semiotics. Mahdi Parsa. 4th ed. Tehran: Sooreh Mehr.
  • Culler, Jonathan. (2009). Structuralist Poetics. Kourosh Safavi. Tehran: Minavi Kherad.
  • Jorjani, Abd-al-Qaher. (1995). Secrets of Eloquence. Jalil Tajlil. Tehran: University of Tehran. [In Persian]
  • Homaei, Jalal al-Din. (1995). Meanings and Rhetoric. Maahdokht Banoo Homaei. 2nd ed. Tehran: Markaz. [In Persian]
  • Nabi-lou, Alireza. (2013). “An Analysis of Binary Oppositions in Hafez’s Ghazals.” Kharazmi University: Biannual Journal of Persian Language and Literature, 21(74), 69–91. [In Persian]
  • Nabi-loo, Alireza. (2019). “A Semiotic Reading of Akhavan’s Inscription.” Tehran University: Research in Contemporary World Literature, 24(1), 283–305.. [In Persian]
  • Nekoutalab, Ghazaleh. (2010). Tehran University: A Semiotic Study of “The Pear Tree” and Its Visual Potential.A. Thesis, Faculty of Persian Language and Literature. [In Persian]
  • Nørgaard, Nina; Busse, Beatrix; & Montoro, Rocío. (2021). A Dictionary of Stylistics. Ahmad Rezaei Jamkarani & Masoud Farahmandfar. 3rd ed. Tehran: Morvarid.
  • Rezaei, Reza. (2022). “An Examination of the Phenomenological Dimensions of Meaning in Goli Taraghi’s Short Story The Pear Tree: A Semio-semantic Approach to Literary Discourse Analysis.” Tarbiat Modares University: International Bimonthly Journal of Linguistic Studies, 13(4), 569–600. [In Persian]
  • Rezaei Jamkarani, Ahmad. (2020). 2nd ed. Tehran: Morvarid. [In Persian]
  • Rezaei Jamkarani, Ahmad. (2021). 2nd ed. Tehran: Morvarid. [In Persian]
  • Sajoodi, Farzan. (2014). Applied Semiotics. 3rd ed. Tehran: Elm. [In Persian]
  • Saeedi-Far, Soheil. (2018). A Semiotic Study of the Film “Dash Akol” and Its Adaptation from Sadeq Hedayat’s Short Story.A. Thesis, Department of Persian Language and Literature, Islamic Azad University of Ardabil. [In Persian]
  • Salehi, Mohammad-Reza & Zaki-Nezhadian, Mohsen. (2017). “The Role of Rhetorical and Linguistic Functions in Commercial Advertising.” Semnan University: Journal of Linguistic and Rhetorical Studies, 8(16), 223–250. [In Persian]
  • Sassure, Ferdinand de. (1999). Cours de linguistique générale. Albert Sechehaye & Charles Bally, with the collaboration of Albert Riedlinger; critical ed. by Tullio De Mauro; afterword by Louis-Jean Calvet. Trans. Nazila Kholkhali. 1st ed. Tehran: Forouzan Rouz.
  • Shamisa, Sirous. (2014). Rhetoric (4th Revised Edition). Tehran: Mitra. [In Persian]
  • Shaeiri, Hamidreza. (2002). Foundations of Modern Semantics. 1st ed. Tehran: SAMT. [In Persian]
  • Safavi, Kourosh. (2016). A Descriptive Dictionary of Literary Studies. 1st ed. Tehran: Elmi. [In Persian]
  • Taraghi, Goli. (2005). Another Place. 4th ed. Tehran: Niloufar. [In Persian]
  • Azima, Vahid. (2020). Cinematic Adaptations of Nasser Taghvai: A Semio-semantic Approach.A. Thesis, Faculty of Persian Language and Literature, Shahid Beheshti University. [In Persian]