A Critical View on Brevity

Document Type : Original Article

Authors

1 PhD in Persian Language and Literature, Lecturer, National Defense University, Tehran, Iran

2 PhD in Persian Language and Literature, Semnan University, Semnan, Iran.

10.22075/jlrs.2025.36708.2598

Abstract

As one of the major topics in the science of rhetorical meaning, brevity has long been a focal point of scholarly inquiry. In the earliest rhetorical texts, brevity was divided into two main types of elliptical and concise brevity. However, the lack of a comprehensive framework and precise definitions for these two types has made it impossible to confidently place all concise phrases or sentences into one of these categories. Therefore, the present research aims to redefine this concept and propose a new classification of brevity. This research has been conducted using a descriptive-analytical method, based on extensive library and documentary studies, and attempts to provide a comprehensive and solid definition as well as an accurate criterion for identifying different types of brevity. The findings of this study suggests that brevity can be examined from two main perspectives. The artistic or rhetorical perspective relates to its impact and aesthetic functions in the text, and the structural perspective refers to the way the concise phrase is organized. From the structural perspective, brevity is divided into two general types of elliptical and concise. Elliptical brevity is further divided into two main branches; elliptical brevity through verbal cues explains the omission of part of a phrase based on the presence of verbal evidence, and elliptical brevity through contextual cues occurs by relying on implicit and meaning-based understanding. Likewise, concise brevity is divided into two types; concise brevity in expression is achieved through rhetorical devices, and non-expressive concise brevity focuses on direct and simple structures. While addressing the gaps in previous studies, this new classification offers a more accurate analysis and comprehensive categorization of brevity and provides a practical tool for researchers in the field of rhetoric.

Keywords

References

  • Ahani, Gholamhossein (1981). Ma'ani va Bayan (Semantics and Rhetoric). 2nd Edition. Tehran: Bonyad-e Quran.
  • Alavi Moghadam, Mohammad & Ashrafzadeh, Reza (2009). Ma'ani va Bayan (Semantics and Rhetoric). 11th Edition. Tehran: Samt.
  • Al-Hashemi, Ahmad (2009). Jawahir al-Balaghah. translated and annotated by Hassan Erfan. 10th Edition. Qom: Balaghat.
  • Askari, Abu Hilal Hassan bin Abdullah bin Sahl (1993). Miyar al-Balaghah. translated by Mohammad Javad Nasiri. Tehran: University of Tehran.
  • Attar Neyshabouri, Farid al-Din (1960). Khosrownameh. edited by Ahmad Sohaili Khansari. Tehran: Zavvar.
  • Gerjani, Abdulqahir (1992). Dala'il al-I'jaz (The Evidence of Inimitability). Cairo: Matba'a Al-Madani.
  • Hafiz, Shams al-Din Mohammad (1980). Divan-e Ghazaliat. edited by Parviz Natel Khanlari. Tehran: Bonyad-e Farhang-e Iran.
  • Hashemi Khorasani, Hojjat (2012). Mofassal Sharh-e Motawwal (A Detailed Commentary on Motawwal). 1st Edition. Qom: Hazeq.
  • Hatif Esfahani (1988). Divan-e Hatif Esfahani with Tarji'-band. edited by Vahid Dastgerdi. with an introduction by Abbas Iqbal Ashtiani. 8th Edition. Tehran: Foroughi.
  • Jorjani, Abdulqahir (1992). Dala'il al-I'jaz (The Proofs of Inimitability). Cairo: Matba'a Al-Madani.
  • Kazazi, Mir Jalal al-Din (2006). Ma'ani: The Aesthetics of Persian Speech. 9th Edition. Tehran: Markaz.
  • Kardeghar, Yahya (2011). "A Review of the Concept of 'Itnab' (Amplification) in Rhetorical Books" Funun-e Adabi (Journal of Literary Techniques). University of Isfahan. 3. No. 2. Issue 5. pp. 73-92.
  • Kordbacheh, Leila (2014). "Ellipsis and Conciseness in Contemporary Poetry (Focusing on the Poems of Nima Yoshij. Ahmad Shamlou. Mehdi Akhavan-Sales, Sohrab Sepehri, and Yadollah Royaee)." Quarterly Journal of Research in Persian Language and Literature. 34. pp. 121-144.
  • Molavi, Jalal al-Din Mohammad Balkhi (2012). Masnavi Ma'navi. edited and annotated by Reynold Alleyne Nicholson. 7th Edition. Tehran: Amir Kabir.
  • Nasser Khosrow Qubadiani, Abu Mo'in (1999). Divan-e Nasser Khosrow (Collected Poems of Nasser Khosrow). 3rd Edition. Tehran: Simay-e Danesh.
  • Najafi, Seyyed Reza (2000). "The Rhetoric of Ellipsis and Conciseness and Its Relation to Metaphor." Maqalat va Barrasi-ha (Articles and Studies). 68. pp. 153-170.
  • Nizami, Ilyas bin Yusuf (2013). Khosrow and Shirin. edited by Hassan Vahid Dastgerdi. revised by Saeed Hamidian. 14th Edition. Tehran: Qatreh.
  • Rajai, Mohammad Khalil (1980). Ma'alem al-Balaghah: On Ma'ani, Bayan, and Badi' (Landmarks of Rhetoric: Semantics, Expression, and Ornamentation). 3rd Edition. Shiraz: University of Shiraz.
  • Sa'd Salman, Masoud (1983). Divan-e Masoud Sa'd Salman. edited by Rashid Yasemi. 1st Edition. Tehran: Amir Kabir.
  • Sa'di, Mosharraf al-Din Mosleh bin Abdollah (2006). Kolliyat-e Sa'di (The Collected Works of Sa'di). edited by Mohammad Ali Foroughi. 1st Edition. Tehran: Hermes.
  • Safa, Zabihollah (1958). A'in-e Sokhan: A Brief Study of Persian Rhetoric (The Art of Speech: A Brief Introduction to Persian Semantics and Rhetoric). 3rd Edition. Tehran: University Printing House.
  • Sharifi, Gholamhossein & Kordbacheh, Leila (2014). "Conciseness and Literary Techniques: The Foundation of Karikalamator" Contemporary Persian Literature. Institute for Humanities and Cultural Studies. 4. No. 3. pp. 117-140.
  • Shamisa, Cyrus (2010). Ma'ani (Semantics). 2nd Edition. 2nd Revision. Tehran: Mitra.
  • Taftazani, Sa'd al-Din Masoud (1989). Sharh al-Mukhtasar. with annotations by Abdul-Muta'al Sa'idi Al-Mudarris. Qom: Ketabforoushi Ketabi Najafi.
  • Zeif, Shawqi (2018). Tarikh va Tatavvor-e Balaghat (The History and Evolution of Rhetoric). translated by Mohammad Reza Torki. 5th Edition. Tehran: Samt.
Journal Of Linguistic and Rhetorical Studies
Volume 16, Issue 39
March 2025
Pages 247-270

Files

Share

How to cite

Statistics