Critique of Forough Farrokhzad's “Let’s Believe in the Beginning of the Cold Season” with the Interpretive Semiotic Approach of Umberto Eco

Document Type : Original Article

Authors

1 Associate Professor of Persian Language and Literature, University of Allameh Tabataba’i, Tehran, Iran (Correspondence author)

2 Master of Persian Language and Literature, University of Allameh Tabataba’i, Tehran, Iran

10.22075/jlrs.2024.32867.2397

Abstract

Hermeneutic semiotics is a platform that can be used to trace dynamic meanings in open texts. This approach provides the possibility of comprehensive investigation and creation of infinite impressions to form a dialectic between the text and the reader. What Umberto Eco expresses by combining Louis Hjelmslev’s ideas about the relationship between expression and content with American pragmatism, leads to encyclopedic semantic criteria, which is proposed as the equivalent of a dictionary of semantics. In the Eco’s semiotics system, all the components of the text, such as metonymy, metaphor, symbol, figures of speech, musicality, etc., are examined in an all-round textual and contextual interpretation and are measured using the axes derived from the four Aristotelian causes to provide a scientific and standard interpretation, from the point of view of the reader of the model. In the current research, Forough Farrokhzad’s poem “Let’s Believe in the Beginning of the Cold Season” (“Imān Biāvarim Be Āqhāze Fasle Sard”) has been examined as an interpretable, symbolic, myth-oriented text in its cultural, ideological, semantic, aesthetic context. The decoding of recurring signs of the poem has been explained with the help of an encyclopedic method at different levels of meaning.

Keywords

Main Subjects

References

  • - Ahmadi, Babak (1370), The text- structure and textural interpretation, Volume 1(Semiotics and Structuralism), Tehran: Markaz.

    - Arian, Hossein, Talkhabi, Mehri (1399), Concptual analysis of death in Forough's poetry based on cognitive metaphore theory, The journal of Linguistic and Rhetorical Studies, Vol 11, Issue. 22, pp. 7-36.

    - Eco, Umberto (1400), La production des signes, Tehran: Sales.

    -  Eco, Umberto khiz.
    - Algune jounaqani, masoud (1395), Umberto Eco and the Semiotic Foundation of Interpretation, Literary Theory and Crititicism, Vol 1, Consecutive issue. 1, pp. 24-47.
    - Algune jounaqani, masoud  (1396) Semiotics Of Poetry, Tehran: Nevise Pârsi

    - Barahani, Reza (1344), Tala Dar Mes (dar shero shaeri), Tehran: chapkhaneye Mehr.

    • Behnam, Alireza (1398), Semiotics and Literature, Tehran: Sibe Sorkh.
      - Hassandoust, Mohammad (1393), An Etymological Dictionary of Persian Language, Vol 1, Tehran: Academy of Persian Language and Literature.
      - Haghshenas, Alimohammad, Attari Latif(1386). Semiotics of Poetry,  journal of Faculty Literatureand Humanities, Issue. 1, pp. 19-45.
      - Samani, Farhad (1383), Esteare mabnaye tafakkor va abzare zibayiafarini, Translated by The group of translators, Tehran: Soureye Mehr.
      - Sojudi, Farzan (1395), Practical Semiotics, Tehran: Elm. - Siahpoush, Hamid (1376),  Lonely Woman: Memorandum of Forough Farokhzad, Tehran: Negah.- Shamisa, Siroos (1376), Take a Look at Forugh Farokhzad, Tehran: Morvarid.
      - Shovalie, zhan, gorboran, allen (1384), Dictionnaire des symbols: mythes, reves, coutumes..., Vol 1,  translated by Soudabe Fazayeli, Tehran: jeyhoun.
      - Sojudi, Farzan ( 1384), Dictionnaire des symbols: mythes, reves, coutumes... Vol 2, translated by Soudabe Fazayeli, Tehran: jeyhoun.
      - Sojudi, Farzan (1382), Dictionnaire des symbols: mythes, reves, coutumes..., Vol 3, translated by Soudabe Fazayeli, Tehran: jeyhoun.
      - Sojudi, Farzan (1385 ), Dictionnaire des symbols: mythes, reves, coutumes..., Vol 4, translated Soudabe Fazayel, Tehran: jeyhoun.
      - Sojudi, Farzan (1387 ), Dictionnaire des symbols: mythes, reves, coutumes..., Vol 5, translated by Soudabe Fazayeli, Tehran: jeyhoun.- Tayefi, Shirzad, Sohrabi, Zohre (1400), Semiotic Analysis of the Function of Chaos in Logos in The First Chapter of Gulistan, The journal of Linguistic and Rhetorical Studies, Vol 12, Issue. 26, pp. 285-314. - Fotuhi, -Mahmoud (1390), Stylistics, Theories and Methods, Tehran: Sokhan.
    • - Farokhzad, Forough (1400),  A collection of  Forough Farokhzad, Tehran: Negah.
    • - Fayyazi, Maryamsadat, Ahmadpour Lakhtegi, Atieh (1401), An Investigation of Movement Schema in Forough Farrokhzad’s Poems, The journal of Linguistic and Rhetorical studies, Vol 13, Issue. 39, pp. 191-218.
    • - karimi, Nazanin, Dadvar, Abolqasem (1399), An Analysis on the Architectural Elements of the Imam Mosque of Isfahan Based on the Semiotic Theory of Umberto Eco, Islamic Art, Vol 17, Issue. 39, pp. 352-336.- Klages,
    • -Mary (1399), Literary Theory: A Guide For The Perplexed, Translated by Jalal Sokhanvar, Elahe Dehnavi, Saeid Sabzian m, Tehran: Akhtaran.
    • - Makaryk, Irena Rima (1384), Encyclopedia of contemporary literary theory: approaches, scholars, terms, Translated by Mehran, Mohajer, Mohammad  Nabavi, Tehran: Agah.
    • - Maleki, Elham, Razzaghpour, Morteza (1395), The Myth of the Hero in Forough Farokhzad’s Poetry, Journal of Literary Criticism and Stylistics Research, Issue. 25. Vol 7, pp. 151-175.
    • - Najmâbadi, Afsaneh(1400), Is Our Name Remembered?, Translated by shirin karimi, Tehran: Bidgol.
The Journal Of Linguistic and Rhetorical Studies
Volume 15, Issue 36
July 2024
Pages 7-50

Files

Share

How to cite

Statistics