An Investigation of Reformulation Markers in English and Persian Linguistics Articles

Document Type : Original Article

Authors

1 Master student of Semnan University

2 Assistant Professor of Linguistics, Semnan University, Semnan, Iran.

Abstract

Reformulation markers are a subset of meta-discourse markers by which the second statement expresses or explains the first statement from a different point of view to make it easier and more convenient for the audience to understand the message. The present research aims to investigate the frequency, function, and type of reformulation discourse markers in English and Persian corpora in linguistics to discover differences and similarities. The English and Persian texts each contain 50 randomly selected articles. Considering the congruence and suitability of Hyland's (2005) model with the scientific discourse, it was used to identify reformulation markers. Murillo's (2012) model was also used in two corpora to study the function of reformulation markers. The obtained quantitative results show that the frequency of reformulation markers in the English sub-corpus is more than in the Persian one. The most significant reformulation markers in the English sub-corpus belonged to "i.e.," and in the Persian sub-corpus is "/ya’ni/". Based on the form, 50 different reformulation markers were found in the overall corpora. The results show that the highest frequency of the reformulation markers function in two sub-corpora is related to the interpretation of explicit meaning (descriptions and specifications). The lowest frequency of the markers function links to implicit meaning (mathematical operations).

Keywords

Main Subjects

References

Asadi, Sh. (2021) Reformulation Markers in English and Persian Literature Research Articles: A Contrastive Analysis. Unpublished M. A. Thesis. Bojnord University.
Barabadi, E., & Aghaee, E. (2021). The Differential Use of Reformulation Markers in Three Sub-corpora: L1 English, L2 English, and L1 Persian. Journal of Teaching Language Skills, 40 (1): 1-32.
Barabadi, Elyas & Seyyed Ehsan Golparvar & Amanollah Arghavan  (2021). To Put It Differently: A Cross-Disciplinary Investigation of Reformulation Markers in Student Essays. Discourse Processes. 58 (9): 787-803
Blakemore, D. (1993). “The relevance of reformulations”. Language and Literature, 2 (2): 101–120.
Blakemore, D. 2007. Or’-parentheticals, ‘that is’-parentheticals and the Pragmatics of Reformulation. Journal of Linguistics 43 (2): 311–339.
Burton-Roberts, N. (2005). Parentheticals. In E. K. Brown (Ed.), Encyclopedia of Language and Linguistics (Vol. 9, pp.179–182). Elsevier.
Candel, D. (1984). Une approche de la langue des physiciens. Langue Française, 64. 93–107.
Crismore, A. (1989). Talking with readers: Metadiscourse as rhetorical act. New York: Peter Lang Publishers.
Cuenca, M. J. (2003). Two ways to reformulate: A contrastive analysis of reformulation markers. Journal of Pragmatics, 35 (7), 1069–1093.
Cuenca, M. J., & Bach, C. (2007). Contrasting the form and use of reformulation markers. Discourse Studies, 9 (2): 149-175.
Dehé, N. & Y. Kavalova (Eds.) (2007). Parentheticals. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
Del Saz Rubio, M. (2006). An overview of Spanish discourse markers of reformulation. ODISEA Revista de estudios ingleses. 7: 89-102.
Gholi Famiyan, Ali Reza & Maryam Kargar (2013). The Analysis of book review Articles in Iranian Linguistics Journals based on Hyland's Metadiscourse Model. The Journal of Research in Linguistics. 5 (9). 37-52.
Gulich, E. & Kotschi, T. (1983). Les marqueurs de reformulation paraphrastique. Cahiers de Linguistique Francaise, 5: 305-351.
Halliday, M. A. K., & R. Hasan (1976). Cohesion in English. London: Longman.
Hyland, K. (2005). Metadiscourse: Exploring Writing in Interaction. London: Continuum.
Hyland, K. (2007). Applying a gloss. Exemplifying and Reformulating in Academic Discourse. Applied Linguistics, 28 (2): 266-285.
Hyland, K. and P. Tse. (2004). ‘Metadiscourse in academic writing: a reappraisal,’ Applied Linguistics, 25 (2): 156–77.
Kazemian, Reza & Mehrdad Vasheghani Farahani (2020). Translating Metadiscourse Features in TED Political Talks: A Parallel Corpus-Based Investigation of Semantic Underspecification in English and Persian. Language and Translation Studies. 53 (2). 127-154.
Khani, Reza and Mehsa Chengizi (2016). Metadiscourse Markers in Applied Linguistics RAs Published in International and Local Journals. Journal of Language Research (Zabanpazhuhi). 10 )18(. 77-102.
Kumpf, E. (2000). Visual meta-discourse: designing the considerate text. Technical Communication Quarterly, 9 (4): 401-421.
Milne, D.E. (2008). The pragmatic role of textual and interpersonal metadiscourse markers in the construction and attainment of persuasion: A cross-linguistic study of newspaper discourse. Journal of Pragmatics, 40 (1): 95–113.
Murillo, S. (2007). A contribution to the pragmalinguistic contrastive Study of explicatory reformulative discourse markers in contemporary journalistic written English and Spanish. Ph.D. thesis. Universidad de Zaragoza.
Murillo, S. (2012). The use of reformulation markers in Business Management research articles: An intercultural analysis. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics, 17 (1): 64-90.
Nekouizadeh, Marzieh & Mohammad Bavali & Mohammad Sadeq Bagheri & Ehsan Rassaei (2020). Metadiscursive Hedging in Research Articles in Applied Linguistics: A Comparative Study of ‘Results and Discussion’ subgenres written by Iranian and Native English Writers. Journal of Foreign Language Research. 10 (2). 448 to 469.
Portolés, J. (1998) Marcadores del discurso. Barcelona: Ariel.
Richards, J. C, & Schmidt, R. (2002). Longman Dictionary of language teaching and applied linguistics. (3rd ed.). London: Longman.
Salehi Mazandarani, Mohammad Reza & Seyyed Mohsen Zaki-Nejadian (2018). The Role of Rhetoric and Lingual Functions in Commercials Scientific-Research. Journal of Linguistic and Rhetorical Studies . 8 (16). 223-250.
Sheikh Sang-Tajn, Shaheen (2020) The study of metadiscourse in the Quran. The Quarterly Journal of Quranic Studies and Islamic Culture. 4 (3). 23-46.
Šinkūnienė, J. (2019). Reformulation markers in academic discourse. A cross-linguistic and cross-disciplinary study. Jezikoslovlje, 20 (3), 531-553.
Taremi, Tahira & Gitti Talkie & Pakzad Yousefian (2018). Gender in Persian Research Articles: A Corpus-based Approach to Interactional Metadiscourse Markers Based on Hyland’s Model. The Journal of Research in Linguistics. 10 (1). 23-42.
Taremi, Tahira & Gitti Talkie & Pakzad Yousefian (2019). The Corpus-based Investigation of Interactive Metadiscourse in the Persian Research Articles: Hylandʼs Model (2005). The Journal of Language Researches. 10 (2). 129-151.
Thompson, G. (2001). “Interaction in academic writing: Learning to argue with the reader”. Applied Linguistics, 22 (1): 58-78.
Vande Kopple, W. J. (1985). Some exploratory discourse on meta-discourse: College Composition and Communication 36 (1): 82-93.
Williams, J. M. (1981). Ten Lessons in Clarity and Grace Chicago. University of Chicago Press.
The Journal Of Linguistic and Rhetorical Studies
Volume 14, Issue 32
August 2023
Pages 317-340

Files

Share

How to cite

Statistics