An Investigation of reference in Persian discourse markers

Document Type : Original Article

Authors

1 PhD student in Linguistics, Azad University, Department of Science and Research, Tehran, Iran.

2 Associate Professor of Linguistics, Tarbiat Modarres University,Tehran, Iran: Corresponding Author

3 Assistant Professor in Linguistics, Azad University, Department of Science and Research, Tehran, Iran.

Abstract

Discourse markers are language elements that linguists do not have a consensus about their nature as well as their role and function. The present study aimed to investigate the function of Persian discourse markers as reference elements, based on Fraser's (1999, 2006) approach. For this purpose, a corpus of two types of political and economic texts was selected. Taking print run and history into consideration, 16 editorials of Kayhan newspaper for political texts and 15 editorials of Donya-e-Eqtesad newspaper for economic texts were analyzed, and the discourse markers were classified into four categories: contrastive, elaborative, inferential and temporal. Data analysis showed that the formula presented by Fraser (1999, 2006), for the sequence of sentences connected by discourse markers, is slightly different in Persian and should be rewritten as S2+DM.S1 /S1.S2 + DM. Furthermore, based on the importance of the information contained in the sentences preceding and succeeding the markers, they can be divided into cataphoric marking (markers placed after the main message), anaphoric marking (markers placed before the main message), and joint marking (markers placed between two main messages). Data analysis indicated that contrastive and elaborative markers are considered as joint marking, and inferential and temporal markers are anaphoric marking in Persian. Based on the research findings, it can be concluded that discourse markers can have a referencing function in information structure.

Keywords

References

Blakemore, D. (1987). Semantic constraints on relevance. Oxford: Blackwell.
Brown, G., and Yule. G. (1983). Discourse analysis. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Crawford, C, B. (2004). Audience-oriented relevance markers in business studies lectures. In G. Del Lungo Camiciotti & E. Tognini Bonelli (Eds.), Academic discourse: new insights into evaluation (pp. 81-97). Bern: Peter Lang.
Crawford, C, B. (2007). The language of business studies lectures. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Deroey, K. L. B. (2015). “Marking importance in lectures: Interactive and textual orientation”. Applied Linguistics, 36(1), 51-72. doi: 10.1093/applin/amt029.
Fischer, K. (2006). Approaches to discourse particles. Elsevier.
Fraser, B. (1996). “Pragmatic markers”. ? Journal of Pragmatics, 6 (2), 167-190.
Fraser, B (1999). What are discourse markers? Journal of Pragmatics, 31, 931-952.
Fraser, B (2006). “Towards a theory of discourse markers”. In: Fischer, Kerstin (Ed.), Approaches to discourse particles, (pp.189-204). Amsterdam: Elsevier Press.
Fraser, B (2009). “Hedging in political discourse”. In papers from the 2d International conference on PD Warsaw. Poland (edited by Piotrcap). pp: 201-212.
Hājeidi Havvā, & Razavian, Hossein (2019/ 1397SH). «Cohesive factors in Chubak's Short Story: Adl». (Avāmel-e ensejām dar dāstān-e Asl-e Sādeq-e Hedāyat). Quarterly Journal of The Journal of linguistic and Rhetorical studies. Motāleāt-e Zabāni va Balāqi. Vol. 9. Issue 18. Pp 69-94.
Hunston, S. (1994). "Evaluation and organization in a sample of written academic discourse". In M. Coulthard (Ed.), Advances in Written Text Analysis (pp. 191–218). London: Routledge.
Lewis, D. (2006). “Discourse markers in English: a discourse pragmatic view”. In Kerstin Fischer. (Ed.), Approaches to discourse particles. Elsevier, pp. 43-59.
Momeni, Negār, (2006/ 1385SH). « Discourse Markers in Persian and English».(Nešāgarhāy-e goftemān dar Farsi va Ingilisi). Quarterly Journal of Pažand. Faslnāmey-e Pažand. Vol. 2. Issue 5. Pp 51-79.
Partington, A. (2014). "The marking of importance in ‘Enlightentainment’ talks". In M. Gotti & D. S. Giannoni (Eds.), Corpus Analysis for Descriptive and Pedagogical Purposes (pp. 143–166). Bern: Peter Lang.
Redeker, G. (1991). "Linguistic markers of discourse structure". Linguistics, 29, 1139-1172.
Sālek, Amirhossein &Jalali Mohammadamir (2022/ 1400SH). «Critical Stylistics of Shah Tahmasb Safavid Letter to Ottoman Sultan Suleiman With a critical discourse analysis approach». (Sabkšenāsiy-e enteqādi-e nāme-e šāh Tahmāsb-e Safavi be soltān Soleimān-e Osmāni bā rūikard-e tahlili-e goftemān-e enteqadi). Quarterly Journal of The Journal of linguistic and Rhetorical studies. Motāleāt-e Zabāni va Balāqi. Vol. 12. Issue 26. Pp 197-232.
Thompson, S. E. (2003). "Text-structuring metadiscourse, intonation and the signaling of organization in academic lectures". Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 2 (1), 5–20.
Zāre, Javād (2019a/ 1397SH). «Reference in Importance Markers in Academic Lectures». (Eerjā dar nešāgarhāy-e ahammiyat-e matlab dar soxanrānihāy-e elmiy-e dānešgāhi). Quarterly Journal of Language Research. Zabān Pažuhi. Vol. 10. Issue 29. Pp 179-192.
Zāre, Javād (2019b/ 1398SH). «An Investigation and Classification of Importance Highlighting Expressions based on Discourse Function and Positioning». (Dastebandi va barrasiy-e ebārāt-e  nešāgar-e ahammiyat-e matlab bar asās-e naqš-e kalami va moqeiyat-e qarārgiri dar erāehāy-e   garhāy-e elmiy-e Fārsi). Quarterly Journal of Language Research. Zabān Pažuhi. Vol. 11. Issue 32. Pp 231-252.
The Journal Of Linguistic and Rhetorical Studies
Volume 14, Issue 32
August 2023
Pages 111-134

Files

Share

How to cite

Statistics