Hidden aspects of meaning in the phonetic layer of Haft-Peykar

Document Type : Original Article

Authors

1 Hakim Sabzevari University

2 Assistant professor of persian language and literature. Hakim

3 linguistic department,literature and humanity faculty,ferdowsi university of Mashhad.

Abstract

In the process of achieving literariness, language moves away from its usual form, and linguistic elements in the text go beyond conventional types for an artistic usage. In outstanding literary works, there is a special link between the content and the way linguistic units are used in different layers. Haft Peykar is also one of the unique works, in which Nezami used various linguistic capacities at various levels to strengthen the content and create a kind of stylistic distinction in this masterpiece. A literary work consists of intertwined layers. Therefore, analyzing the text of Haft Peykar with a layered stylistic approach is a proper way to discover the linguistic capacities and artistic function of language units. Accordingly, the role of each layer in the production and transmission of the message is specified in the analysis of that layer. Among the linguistic layers, the phonetic layer is considered as an introduction to language analysis since sound is the first tangible sign of language. In addition to their role in increasing musicality, the components that can be studied for their external, internal, spiritual, and lateral music have found an artistic function concerning the meaning in the Nezami’ words so that even the smallest linguistic units play a significant role in producing and transmitting the message of the work. The rhythmic capacities in the external music cause the music that governs the different spaces of the text to be consistent with the content and the induction of meaning. In lateral music, the purposeful selection of rhyme scheme Rhyme scheme and the resulting melody facilitate signification, production and transfer of meaning from the sound level to the content. Literary techniques are used in the inner music similar to perceptual coding, which leads to readers’ further contemplation and also creates a kind of hypertext signification. The connection of spiritual music with content and the creation of marginal meanings is a novel method that has bestowed a kind of stylistic distinction to Nezami’s words.

Keywords

References

  1. Algoneh Jouneghani, Masoud (1397sh). “Semiotics of poetry” ( Neshaneh- Shenasi-e She’r). ch1.Tehran: neviseh parsi.

2.Eslami Nedoshen&Mohamadali(1374sh).” The endless story of hafez” (Majaray Payan Napazir Hafez) . ch 2 . Tehran: Yazdan.

3.AlborzI,Parviz(1386sh).” Fundamentals of text linguistics” (Mabaniy-e Zaban- Shenasy-e Matn). ch1.Tehran :Amirkabir.

4.Bart,Rolan(1397sh).” Fundamentals of semiotics” (Mabaniy-e Neshaneh-shenasy) . ch1.Tehran: Elmy v Farhangi.

5.Pournamdariyan,Taghy v Nahid Tehrani Sabet (1390sh). (Negahi Digar be jenas).” Another look at pun  (paronomasia)” Nashriyh-e elmi Pazhoheshy Oloum v Fonon. No 3&sal 3. Pp21-28.

6.Daneshgar,Azar v Lila Rahmatiyan(1399sh).” Analysis of bushi garms discourse in the novel “body of farhad” by abbas maroufi” (Vakavy-e Gofteman boveshy garmes dar roman Pikar Farhad Abas Maarofi). Fasl-nameh-e elmi-e tafsir v tahlil moton zaban v adabiyat farsi(dehkhoda) vol12. No46.Pp13-34.

7.Radfar. Abolghassem(1368sh).” Rhetorical-literary culture” (farhang-e balaghy-adabi).ch1.Tehran:etelaat.

8.zarinkoub,abdolhossein(1383sh).” The old man of Ganjeh in search of Utopia “ (Pir-e Ganjeh dar Jostojoy-e Nakoja abad). ch6. Tehran:sokhan.

9.Jorjani,Abdolghaher(1374sh).” Secrets of Sermons” (asraralbalagheh). Tr.By jalil tajlil. Tehran:daneshgahe Tehran.

10.Jahantigh,Maryam(1380sh).” Dear Apple “( sib-e jan) ch1. Tehran:sokhan.

11.khadish,pegah(1391sh).” Morphology of Persian magical legends” (rikht-shenasi-e afsanehay jadoi Irani) ch2 .Tehran:elmi farhangi.

12.Saeedy. Habibollah(1390sh).” Introduction to text linguistics” (moghadameh-e zaban-shenasi matn) MA Thesis, danesh-kadeh-e adabiyat v olom ensani daneshgaheh-e ferdousi mashhad.

13.Samiei, Ahmad Et al(1386sh).” Fundamentals of Linguistics “( Mabani-e Zaban-shenasy). ch1. Tehran:Sherkat chap v nashr ketabhaei darsy.

14.Shafei-e KadkanI, Mohamadreza(1386sh).” Music of poetry” (Mosighi-e she’r). ch10. Tehran:aghah.

15:Shamisa, Seerous(1381sh).” A fresh look at the novelty” (Negahy Tazeh be badi) ch14. Tehran: ferdous.

  1. Shamisa, Seerous(1393sh).” Generalities of stylistics” ( Koliyat Sabk Shenasy) ch4. Tehran :Mitra.

17.Talebiyan, Yahya v Mahdii Eslamiyat(1388sh).” Investigating the musical role of rhyme in Hafez's poetry” ( Baresi-e Naghsh-e Mosighiaii-e Ghafiyh dar shee’r-e Hafez). nashriy elmi pazhoheshy nasr pazhohy adab farsi danesh-gahe kerman. No25payapey(22). Pp115-140.

18.Falk, Joliyas es(1377sh).” Linguistics and language”

 ( Zaban-shenasi v zaban). Tr.Br Khosro Gholamalizade. ch2. Mashhad:Aastan ghods.

  1. Fotohi-e roud-majani, Mahmoud(1395sh).” Stylistics of theories, approaches, and methods” ( Sabk-shenasi nazariyeha). roykardha v raveshha. chap3. Tehran:sokhan.

20.Ghassemi, Ziya(1397sh).” Literary style from a linguistic point of view” ( sabk adabi az didgah-e zaban-shenasi). ch2. Tehran:Amirkabir.

21.Ghavimi, Mahvash(1383sh).” Voice and Induction: An Approach to the Poetry of AkhavanSales “( Ava v elgha:rahyafty be she’r Akhavan-sales).ch1. Tehran:hermes.

  1. Ebadiyan, Mahmoud (1372sh).” An Introduction to Stylistics in Literature “ ( Daramady bar Sabk-shenasi dar Adabiyat). ch2. Tehran:Avay-e nor.
  2. Gholamrezaei, Mohamad (1391sh).” Stylistics of Persian poetry from Rudaki to Shamloo” ( Sabk-shenasy-e she’r parsi az Rodaki ta Shamlo). chap4. Tehran:Jami.

24.Latif nezhad. Farokh(1396sh).” Method of composing and receiving the text in contemporary poetry “( Nahveh tashkil v daryaft matn dar Ashar Moasser). chap1. Tehran:sokhan.

25.motahedin, zhaleh(1354sh).” Repetition, its audio and rhetorical value” (tekrar , arzesheh souti v balaghi an). Nashriyeh-e danesh-kadeh adbiyat v oloume ensani mashhad. sal11. No43. Pp90-109.

26.Moradi, Siyavash& Sae’d Faramarzi fard & Hadi Khadivar (1399sh).” The semiotics of the concept of love in Weiss and Ramin's poetry book based on Daniel Chandler's theory of cryptography” (Neshaneh-Shenasi Mafhome eshgh dar manzomeh Veis v Ramin bar asas nazariee Ramzgan Daniel Chendler). Faslnameh-e elmi tafsir v tahlil moton zaban v adbiat farsy(dehkhoda). vol 12. No 44. 265-286.

  1. Mohaghegh-e Neishabouri, Javad& Et al (1399sh).”function Music of poetry in story Sanan of sheikh ” (Karkerd-e mousighi-e she’r dar hekaiate sheikh-e Sanan) . majaleh-e elmi pazhoheshiy motaleate zabani v balaghy sal 11. no 22. Pp359-414.

28.Mohamadi, Ali v Tahereh Ghassemi dourabadi(1395sh).” Investigating the role of rhyme in phonetic changes of Persian language “(barrsi-e naghshe ghafieh dar tahavolat avai-e zaban-e farsi). nashriey fonon adabi No2 payapey(15). sal8. Pp15-32.

29.Majd, Omid(1393sh).” Some rhetorical subtleties and hidden educational meanings in Saadi's words” ( barkhy zerafathay balaghi v manaei penhan-e ta’limi dar sokhan sa’di). nashriih pazhohesh-nameh adabiyat-e ta’limy. No21. sal6. Pp109-126.

30.Moazeni, Alimohamad& Abdoreza Seif & Aliasghar Faraz(1399sh).” Types of rhymes and lines in the Iraqi’s sonnets and their musical role” (aghsame ghafiyh v radif dar ghazalhay Araghy v naghsh mosighaey an . majaleh-e elmi pazhoheshiy motaleate zabani v balaghy sal 11. no 22. Pp251-275.

31.Nezami,Elyasebne Yosef(1380sh).” Haft Peykar” ( Haft Peikar). With the Effort of Sae’d Hamidiyan. ch4. Tehran:ghatre.

32.Vahidiyan Kamyar, Taghy(1388sh).” Innovative from an aesthetic point of view” (badii az Didgah-e zibai-shenasy). ch4. Tehran:samt.

33.Homai,Jalalaldin(1370sh).” Rhetoric techniques and figures of speech” ( Fonon-e belaghat v sanaate adabi) ch7. Tehran:homa.

  1. Verdank, Piter (1389sh).” Fundamentals ofstylistics” ( Mabani-e sabk-shenasi). ch1. Tehran:nashr-e ney.

35-Beaugrande, Robert & Dressler, Alain Wolfgang. (2002AH). An Itroduction To Text Linguistics. London: Longman.

  1. lotman,Y. (2010AH).Nepredskazuemye mekhanizmy kultury. Tallinn, Estonia: TLU Press. Lenhoff , G. ; Vroon, R. & Arbor, A. MIT: University of Michgan Press.
  2. lotman,Y. (2009AH).Culture and Explosion. Edited by Marina Grishakova and trans- lated by Wilma Clark.Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter
The Journal Of Linguistic and Rhetorical Studies
Volume 13, Issue 28
July 2022
Pages 287-316

Files

Share

How to cite

Statistics